Abandoned Alpha: Winning Portfolios Own Oil Products and Natural Gas
Hydrocarbons are discarded winning stakes not stranded assets
October 5, 2025
Executive summary
- Contrary to a common belief, petroleum and natural gas resources (“hydrocarbons”) are not stranded assets that investors can ignore. They have become abandoned alpha and are highly likely to be one of the most reliable sources for portfolio outperformance and human prosperity through the end of this decade and probably beyond (2025 Commodity Outlook: Abandoned Alpha, 8-Jan-2025).
- In 2025 to date, the consensus-busting outperformance of U.S. independent oil refiners’ price returns relative to the S&P 500 already validates our contrarian assessment from nine months ago. An equal-weighted basket of U.S. independent oil refiners has returned more than +50% YTD versus a +14% YTD return for the S&P 500.
- Moreover, the refiners’ outperformance has been consistent and broad: VLO has beaten the S&P 500 YTD on 91% of trading days in 2025, while MPC has beaten with 96% frequency. The members of a U.S. refiners’ basket have beaten the S&P 500 YTD price return with 95% frequency since May 16 and 99% since Aug 21. Individual refiners within the U.S. basket are beating 86% to 99% of the individual names within the S&P 500 YTD.
- Likewise, the price for an equal-weighted basket of U.S. independent natural gas producers surged far beyond market averages in 1H2025. By June 20 YTD, the gas basket had returned +24.7% versus +1.5% for the S&P 500.
- Following a sharp but brief midsummer downdraft driven by well understood fuel competition economics, the gas producers’ basket has advanced by +13.5% since Aug 19 to outpace the S&P 500’s +4.7% gain. Since Sep 22, the splits are even stronger: +8.5% for the gas basket and +0.3% for the S&P 500. Strengthening commodity economics underwrite this value creation, which we are happy to discuss in full detail in one-on-one meetings. The NYM 12-month (12M) natural gas strip has advanced by +14% from $3.45 (Aug 25) to $3.95 (Oct 3) and the 15M, 18M, and 24M strips are now all above $4.00 and rising.
- Meanwhile, hyperscalers and a wide array of other technology firms are collectively calling on U.S. gas-fired power plants and other U.S. electrical production capacity at sustained load growth rates not witnessed since the 1950s but likely to sustain into 2030.
- Abandoned Alpha means winning stakes have been discarded. Winning investors will pick them up. For investors who care about beating benchmarks for their clients while underwriting a prosperous, ecologically-sound future for human society, these stakes are available for extraordinarily cheap cost relative to own value and competing securities’ inflated valuations. The setup strongly implies a coming, rational, and large rotation to sell the expensively priced common stocks propelling index CAPE ratios to 40x and to buy cheaply valued common stocks that are essential but unloved.
Commentary
Hydrocarbons are essential feedstocks into every industry, and every investment theme geared toward inventing an abundant future for human civilization is entirely dependent on their responsible use.
Yet, the past decade promulgated dogmas that encouraged senseless jawboning over false choices, such as between supposed “clean” and “dirty” energy. Investors can no longer afford the distraction of manufactured fights over deliberately pejorative slurs.
Without access to hydrocarbons—as Silicon Valley is now increasingly, if belatedly, proving by its actions—there are no electric vehicles, no tertiary care hospitals, no data centers, and no artificial intelligence (AI) workbots. All planned solar PV arrays, wind turbines, and battery storage projects dissolve in a poof of irony. Every hyperscaler, IPP, and AI-equipment unicorn dies on the vine for lack of hydrocarbon nourishment and due respect for the periodic table of elements.
These facts of physical chemistry (“science”) conflict with investors’ indifference toward, if not outright divestment from, oil and gas assets. This conflict is not sustainable. The public and private securities of essential upstream producers, midstream distributors, and downstream refiners and processors of petroleum and natural gas commodities have become abandoned alpha.
Nine months ago, we made these observations the centerpiece of our 2025 Commodity Outlook (Abandoned Alpha, 8-Jan-2025) because we expected this truth would finally come home to roost in this year. Coming into January 2025, we assessed the truth-telling process would begin with consensus-busting advances in the shares of U.S. independent oil refiners and U.S. independent natural gas producers, as local demand started to surpass crucial thresholds for local supply. We continue to expect these local economics will evolve next into a wider and more global process that extends at least into 2028 and most likely beyond.
Moreover, this oil and gas theme, Abandoned Alpha, is part of a larger nexus within AI compute and innovations in nuclear power that we believe altogether is helping spur the most consequential transformation of the world political economy in the past 80 years. By some measures, ever. This long-cycle “storm” has been anticipated by George Friedman, William Strauss, Neil Howe, us, and others. But confused observers continue to misinterpret the present and coming transformations through a backward-focused lens that has scant hope of profitably navigating the future (Cyclical Transformations, Not Recession: Anyone? Anyone?, 31-Jul-2025).
With respect to the narrow question of oil refining and upstream gas, the market evidence through 2025 to date validates the assessment we published nine months ago. Investors who owned oil product spreads and natural gas strips were positioned correctly and have beaten their benchmarks by huge margins. Bearish investors positioned short were wrong and have lost.
Specifically, an equal-weighted basket of refiners (VLO, MPC, PSX, CVI, DK, DINO) has returned +50.8% YTD, with each member company beating the S&P 500’s YTD price return (+14.2%) and the basket beating the benchmark by 3,660 bp. Moreover, outperformance has been consistent: VLO has beaten the S&P 500 YTD on 91% of trading days in 2025, while MPC has beaten with 96% frequency. The basket’s frequency of trading-day beats against the benchmark’s YTD price return is 95% since May 16 and 99% since Aug 21. Individual refiners within the basket are beating 86% to 99% of the individual names within the S&P 500 YTD.
Likewise, the price for an equal-weighted basket of gas producers (EQT, EXE, RRC, AR) surged far beyond market averages in 1H2025. By June 20 YTD, the gas basket had returned +24.7% versus +1.5% for the S&P 500. The underlying power-demand economics were so strong they spurred summertime price-driven fuel switching from gas toward coal for electricity generation. This seasonal dynamic drove a drawdown in gas shares (sector-typical, if larger-than-normal), as the Trump Administration facilitated the fuel switching with retirement deferrals on the J.H. Campbell 1.42 GW coal plant in Michigan and other coal assets slated to be closed in 2025. The drawdown was sharp but complete by Aug 19, with the gas basket then returning –5.1% YTD against a +9.0% YTD return for the S&P 500. Since Aug 19, the gas basket has advanced by +13.5% to outpace the S&P 500’s +4.7% gain. Since Sep 22, the splits are even stronger: +8.5% for gas basket and +0.3% for S&P 500. The NYM 12-month (12M) natural gas strip has advanced by +14% from $3.45 (Aug 25) to $3.95 (Oct 3) and the 15M, 18M, and 24M strips are now all above $4.00 and rising.
Behavioral evidence from the tech community also supports the assessment we made nine months ago and continue to hold today. It is now clear that 2025 will go down in the history books as the year Silicon Valley’s visionary mechanical engineers and computer scientists finally saw the U.S. electricity grid as it is rather than as “dirty energy” aspersions dream it to be. We assess the scientists in the software tech community now see the challenges and opportunities already long understood by the physical scientists in the energy community. Now standing on common ground as partners, they are together constructing the logical and necessary engineering solutions through natural gas, as well as nuclear and other energy solutions, to supply 99.999% reliable electricity to data centers for AI applications that will, hopefully, turbocharge human knowledge and universal progress.
As strong AI-driven power demand growth calls on energy feedstocks both on-grid and behind the meter, the hyperscalers are also responsibly committed to preserve America’s high standard of electrical reliability (99.97%) for residential and commercial consumers in the hottest summers and coldest winters, even if it means order of precedence will rank order the security of a vulnerable elderly person freezing in South Bend over a hedge fund analyst drinking a mochaccino and calling on Gemini in New York City. This is good. The combination of social responsibility and world-leading innovation is yet another example of why America wins against all world competition.
Here are just five examples at the hyperscale level: (1) April 2025: xAI extends installation to 35 onsite gas turbines at its Memphis, Tennessee Colossus cluster to power >100,000 GPUs, (2) August 2025: Meta’s $10 billion hyperscale campus development in Louisiana will rely on dedicated power from three new gas-fired power plants that Entergy will build by 2028 at a cost of $3 billion. (3) June 2025: Microsoft announces its 20-year purchase power agreement (PPA) with Constellation Energy will include restart of Unit 1 at the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania for dedicated power to multiple data centers, (4) June 2025: Crusoe Energy orders 19 GE Vernova LM2500XPRESS gas turbines to serve OpenAI’s Stargate project in Abilene, Texas; and (5) February 2025: EdgeConneX holds first public hearings on its plan (now moving forward after July 2025 filings) to develop two data centers in New Albany, Ohio using onsite gas-fired power to support 1.2 million square feet of computing infrastructure.
One crucial aspect to understand about Abandoned Alpha is its recognition of the surprisingly investor-discarded values in oil and gas assets does not mean Abandoned Alpha opposes solar, wind, hydro, geothermal, ocean wave, nuclear fission, nuclear fusion, or any other competitive and sensible solution to humanity’s fuel and non-fuel problems. To the precise contrary, Abandoned Alpha expressly rejects the nonsensical assertion of binary and fatal conflict, including what we expect to be the ultimate game-changing technology for power markets in the 2040s and afterward, nuclear fusion.
More practically today and through 2030, the inevitable rotation away from expensive CAPE 40x-valued common stocks will benefit unloved, too-cheaply-valued common stocks in energy, materials, and industrials. The central task now for any competitive analyst and/or PM, human or AI, is to identify these common stocks, to build a long position in them, and to own them through 2028+.
Nuclear fusion energy, once it is developed at scale, will forever turn over this apple cart, by definition (A Star Is Born). We monitor every fusion experimental result reported publicly by every laboratory in the world, to the best of our ability to track progress. But fusion is not here yet and even once it inevitably arrives, human economies will still need hydrocarbons for use as materials, not least of which in wires and cables.
At that point, a valid research question will be whether humanity shifts over time to source hydrocarbons for materials use from air, water, and/or land (plants), rather than harvesting subterranean basins, in some combination of natural and synthetic processes. That real and coming risk is beyond the scope of present investment realities and therefore is put to the side for now.
This material is published by Blacklight Research, LLC (“Blacklight”) for informational, educational, and institutional research purposes only. All content has been compiled and presented as general market commentary and non-personalized research, without regard to the investment objectives, financial condition, risk tolerance, hedging needs, regulatory status, tax position, or other circumstances of any particular company, institution, fund, account, or individual. Nothing in this material is intended as, and nothing should be construed as, investment advice, trading advice, commodity trading advice, hedging advice, legal advice, tax advice, accounting advice, or any other form of individualized professional advice. This material is not an offer, solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, or invitation to buy, sell, subscribe for, hedge, or otherwise transact in any security, commodity, futures contract, option, swap, derivative, currency, index product, physical cargo, commercial contract, or other financial or commercial instrument. Any companies, securities, commodities, futures, options, swaps, contracts, indices, or strategies referenced herein are discussed solely for illustrative, analytical, or informational purposes. Blacklight is an independent publisher. Blacklight is not a broker-dealer, investment adviser, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, futures commission merchant, introducing broker, swap dealer, or security-based swap dealer. Blacklight does not manage client assets, direct trading in securities or commodity interests, maintain discretionary authority over any account, execute or clear securities, futures, swaps, or other transactions, or provide individualized or customized investment, trading, hedging, or risk-management advice. Users are solely responsible for their own investment, trading, hedging, commercial, and risk-management decisions and actions, including any independent assessment of suitability, risk, liquidity, valuation, regulatory constraints, and legal obligations. Blacklight’s publications include macroeconomic analysis, commodity and market commentary, forward-looking assessments, geopolitical analysis, sector research, and other forms of substantive institutional research designed to assist clients in forming their own independent investment and commercial judgments. Blacklight’s publications may constitute research services that institutional clients may evaluate for eligibility under Section 28(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, subject to each client’s own good-faith determination and applicable law. Blacklight does not determine any client’s eligibility for Section 28(e) treatment and makes no representation that any client’s use of Blacklight research will qualify for such treatment. The information and opinions presented herein are based on data, market prices, company materials, government and regulatory publications, industry sources, news reports, third-party databases, proprietary data services, and other sources Blacklight deems to be reliable. Blacklight uses such sources in accordance with applicable license terms where relevant. Blacklight does not, however, make any representation, warranty, assurance, or guarantee, express or implied, as to the completeness, accuracy, timeliness, reliability, suitability, or availability of any information contained herein. Data may be incomplete, delayed, revised, restated, mis-transcribed, misinterpreted, or superseded. Any estimates, calculations, conversions, forecasts, scenarios, probabilities, and forward-looking assessments are based on assumptions that may prove incorrect and are subject to material uncertainty. The views expressed herein reflect Blacklight’s interpretations as of the date of publication and are subject to change without notice. All pricing, market data, and positioning data are as of the latest closing date prior to publication unless otherwise stated. Blacklight has no obligation to update, supplement, or revise this material after publication, or to notify any reader if any information, opinion, forecast, scenario, or assumption changes; however, Blacklight may, in its discretion, correct material errors that it identifies. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future performance, and future results may differ materially from any historical performance, forecast, estimate, scenario, or projection discussed herein. Unless otherwise disclosed in the relevant publication, Blacklight and its principals, employees, contractors, or affiliates may hold positions in securities, commodities, futures, options, swaps, currencies, physical commodities, issuers, sectors, or instruments discussed, and such positions may change without notice. For this publication, Blacklight and the author(s) have disclosed any material financial conflicts they are aware of as of publication. No part of the compensation of any Blacklight analyst is determined by the specific views expressed in any publication or in any public or private meeting with clients. Trading, investing, hedging, or transacting in securities, commodities, futures, options, swaps, physical energy products, currencies, and related instruments involves substantial risk, including the possible loss of principal, liquidity risk, leverage risk, basis risk, volatility risk, counterparty risk, operational risk, regulatory risk, and the risk that market conditions change rapidly and unexpectedly. Commodity futures, options, swaps, and other derivatives may be unsuitable for many market participants and can involve losses exceeding initial margin or investment. Any discussion of hedging or risk management is general in nature and should not be interpreted as advice to implement or refrain from implementing any hedge, trade, or strategy. Any trade, shipment, financing, hedging, investment, commercial activity, or contractual arrangement involving affected regions, cargoes, vessels, counterparties, issuers, commodities, or instruments may be subject to sanctions, export controls, import controls, maritime law, market rules, exchange rules, position limits, anti-money-laundering rules, anti-corruption laws, and other legal or regulatory requirements. Readers are responsible for obtaining their own legal, regulatory, tax, accounting, compliance, and commercial advice before taking any action. This material may discuss war, terrorism, sanctions, geopolitical conflict, maritime incidents, physical infrastructure damage, or other events with serious human, security, and humanitarian consequences. Such discussion is included solely for the purpose of analyzing potential market, economic, commercial, and policy implications. Blacklight does not intend to minimize human suffering, endorse any political or military action, or attribute responsibility beyond the sources and analysis cited or described in the relevant publication. Blacklight is not liable for any loss, damage, cost, expense, or other consequence arising directly or indirectly from reliance on this material or any other content published by Blacklight. Blacklight’s research is published broadly and contemporaneously to clients and is not tailored to specific portfolio needs. Publications are distributed electronically by email and through website portals; delivery times may vary due to factors beyond Blacklight’s control. Blacklight does not provide client-specific versions of its publications, preferential access to unpublished research, or individualized follow-up advice tailored to any subscriber’s portfolio, trading book, hedging program, risk limits, tax position, or commercial exposure. This material is for the recipient’s personal or institutional internal use only and may not be copied, reproduced, modified, excerpted, distributed, redistributed, forwarded, posted, transmitted, or otherwise shared, in whole or in part, without Blacklight’s prior written consent. Cover art, charts, graphics, tables, photographs, and other visual materials are Blacklight intellectual property, generated materials, licensed content, public-domain content, or materials otherwise used in accordance with applicable law. All rights are reserved.